Joined
·
92 Posts
Are you just joining the game in the 9th inning, lawdog? Yes, the SO assists the US Postal Inspection Service with sweeps. At the request of the US Postal Inspection Service, one K-9 unit does a sweep of packages...I don't know how often. The accusation is that the SO does motor vehicle patrols, making chap 90 stops, and that's not true.lawdog671 said:Small portion of a July 6, 2007 Worcester Telegram and Gazette article....article doesn't help the arguement much huh STR8?? OTTO?...WCSO doesn't actiely patrol anywhere?? WCSO didn't do anything in press about the seizure?? Glodis doesn't support WCSO acting in police capacity??
I suppose I can find out for you, since you're so concerned. In my dealings with them, I haven't asked for their resume.lawdog671 said:If you're going to come out and claim they are all well trained answer the basic questions that TRAINED police are asking you. What is the basic standard level of training to become a D/S, and are they all so qualified?
We can't, by law, use those cells for two reasons...one, no natural light. And two, they are manual release doors only, and because of fire or emergency evacuation concerns, doors must be both electronic and manual release. But, since you worked in central control, you already knew that.lawdog671 said:Again, if there were space at the jail, your detainee would be there. I WOULD expect you to understand that.
I recall sitting in central control on many occasions where there were 7 or 8 cells aptly called "county lockup" that were empty and yet local PDs were told we had no space available...When every cell and floor spot is full...then you're full...
It is AMAZING to me how much you guys think you know, and you really, really don't. You simply assume the WCSO let's lawsuits happen...how'd you come to that conclusion, exactly? It is a baseless, mindless assumption, and nothing more. A tremendous amount of time and energy goes into litigation, but the best way to beat lawsuits is to avoid them altogether.lawdog671 said:Before you tell me that there are things called civil lawsuits and prisoners have rights.....when CONS sue.....don't just bend over and take it...fight it..
Again, you simply assume that the SO doesn't fight for money. I've already explained in an earlier post ALL of the things the SO has done to try to get money, and the difficult in getting it when the Governor shuts the door on it...and since I don't need SinePari complaining about my repetition, ad nauseum, I won't repeat it.lawdog671 said:.fight for money to expand the JAIL and not your authority....THIS is why Glodis catches a public paycheck....TO FIX THESE PROBLEMS...
What's there to say....someone made a mistake. There's no defense for mistakes, they shouldn't happen. And I'm sure the person responsible for that mistake knows full well the repercussions of it. Maybe you'd like to contact that person directly and berate them...would that make you feel better?lawdog671 said:Cant help but notice that those so adamantly fighting here in defense of WCSO are oddly quiet in the thread regarding wrongful release of that felon....
Do you just skip my posts and go straight to writing another one? I know I get accused of repeating myself, so I'll try not to. By "so overstaffed", you're talking about two officers, at the most, at any given time.....if they aren't called out, they are at the jail. If you can't find ANYTHING else to complain about, which I find hard to believe, then two officers who MIGHT be off campus every now and then, then I'd say we're doing pretty good.lawdog671 said:STR8 YET AGAIN YOU DODGED A QUESTION I ASKED DIRECTLY.....ARE YOU SO OVERSTAFFED/ADEQUATELY STAFFED THERE THAT YOU CAN AFFORD TO LET ANY STAFF OUT OF JAIL TO DO THESE THINGS??